By Dr. Arun Singh,
Global Chief Economist,
Dun & Bradstreet India

10th Nov 2020

IMF’s ‘baseline scenario’ looks too optimistic

 

Commentary:

“Even with imminent, successful disease control in some parts of the world, the global coronavirus shock will easily eclipse the 2008-09 financial crisis. While the baseline forecast in the IMF’s October World Economic Outlook is for world output to regain its pre-pandemic level in 2021, Dun & Bradstreet forecasts say this will not occur before 2022. The IMF’s adverse scenario assumes a resurgence in the virus, a slow roll-out of vaccines and treatments, and unequal country access to the latter. We believe that the resurgence of the virus where community transmission was not eliminated in Q2, alongside uncertainty about vaccines and treatments, means that some elements of such an adverse scenario will inevitably be realised. India also faces the risk of resurgence in the virus from the ongoing festival season. This might weaken the tentative signs of demand witnessed across various high-frequency economic indicators. Nonetheless, businesses have found support from the festival related demand and the stimulus measures announced recently by the government and the Central Bank to support consumer and investment demand. This is evidenced from the increase in the optimism levels of firms” said Dr Arun Singh, Global Chief Economist, Dun & Bradstreet. 

Introduction

Policymakers now realise that emergency controls on high-contact sectors are required to limit a second wave of the epidemic, but that these alone will not eliminate the virus. Thus no V-shaped recovery is possible without pharmaceutical interventions that do not yet exist, or are as yet unproven. Accordingly, part of the large shocks seen to date in 2020 could endure in any ‘new normal’, including the 9% fall in global emissions in Q1-Q2 and the 5-10% y/y drop in manufacturing output in many economies in July-August. Problematically for the outlook, more and more countries, especially in Europe, have reintroduced lockdown measures since the start of October as the Covid-19 caseload has reached new all-time highs.

Meanwhile, the sectoral footprint of the crisis is becoming clearer. The pandemic is most of all a crisis of the transportation and hospitality sectors, and the services sector globally has been more shocked than manufacturing. The latter shrank 11.6% y/y in output terms in Q1-Q2, ahead of construction’s 9.0% contraction, but short of the 14.6% decline in retail, wholesale, transportation, and accommodation sectors.

OECD governments with investment grade ratings have paid up to limit the contagion impacts of the shock, for example by maintaining household incomes. Central bank interventions, which were mostly complete by June, have masked solvency problems in stressed sectors with plentiful liquidity and loosened bankruptcy frameworks. The result has been a global financial crisis averted, limited credit impairments, and many financial sectors reporting a good Q2 despite the global crisis.

However, all these feats only pay off if the disease is contained quickly. Given that escaping the crisis looks hard due to the epidemiological situation, such bail-outs may only delay insolvency in vulnerable sectors until 2021, failing to build a ‘bridge to recovery’, while inviting new challenges for fiscal debt servicing and bank capital. Indeed, the plunge in net savings rates into negative territory of OECD economies in Q2 is a concern in the US, but also for Canada, France, the UK, Italy and Spain. It reduces the financial resources of firms, households, and governments – resources they need to rebound from the pandemic shock.

 

Ratings Upgrades

  1. Italy: positive impact on the outlook from regional elections, referendum vote, and economic developments.

 

Ratings Downgrades

  1. Azerbaijan: armed conflict with Armenia poses a serious threat to the political environment.
  2. Czech Republic: lockdown imposed as coronavirus cases increase, affecting economic prospects.
  3. Singapore: rise in payments performance risks as the outlook for externally-oriented sectors darkens.

 

Dun & Bradstreet Country Risk Analysis

Country

October 2020

November 2020

Change

 

Country Risk Rating Upgrades (risk level has improved)

Italy

DB4d

DB4c

1 quartile

 

 

 

 

 

Country Risk Rating Downgrades (risk level has deteriorated)

Azerbaijan

DB5c

DB6a

2 quartiles

Czech Republic

DB3b

DB3d

2 quartiles

Singapore

DB2d

DB3a

1 quartile

 

Outlook Trend Upgrades (from/to)

Bangladesh

Deteriorating

Stable

 

Ecuador

Deteriorating

Stable

North Macedonia

Deteriorating Rapidly

Deteriorating

Pakistan

Deteriorating

Stable

 

Panama

Deteriorating

Stable

 

Philippines

Deteriorating

Stable

 

Sweden

Stable

Improving

 

 

Outlook Trend Downgrades (from/to)

Albania

Improving

Stable

 

Australia

Stable

Deteriorating

Bosnia & Herzegovina

Improving

Deteriorating

Croatia

Improving

Stable

Germany

Improving

Stable

Romania

Improving

Stable

Ukraine

Stable

Deteriorating

Monthly changes in country risk ratings and outlook trends

 

REGIONAL SUMMARIES

 

Asia Pacific

China is the best-placed major global economy, but even its private sector and private consumption are flagging, with the recovery driven primarily by the supply-side boosting projects; its demand for commodities has outpaced its actual final demand due to strategic reserve purchasing so far in 2020, boosting regional trade and global commodity prices.

 

North America

October’s surge in positive Covid-19 cases creates new risks of disruption for the recovery and delays in reopening the North American border. Despite our standard risk scores having begun to improve in the US, payment difficulties remain historically high, bringing added risks given the weakened base relative to early 2020.

 

Western and Central Europe

The regional outlook is deteriorating as more and more states re-implement lockdown measures amid a second Covid-19 wave (resulting in a higher case load than in March/April 2020). As consequence, real GDP growth as well as credit risk will be adversely affected. Brexit uncertainty also adds to the bleak outlook.

 

Latin America & Caribbean

Easing Covid-19 restrictions are supporting the region’s multi-speed recovery, although containment of the virus is yet to be achieved. Austerity measures and fiscal rules (where applicable) will help rein in expanded budget deficits and ultimately contribute to the attainment of medium-term debt sustainability.

 

Eastern Europe & Central Asia

An armed conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is destabilising the Caucasus region, with Turkey and Russia, the region’s leading powers, unable to force their respective allies into an armistice. Meanwhile, economic headwinds are also increasing as the number of Covid-19 cases rises in most economies in the region.

 

Middle East & North Africa

Geopolitical tensions remain high, but the outcome of the US presidential election could see these ease – as would further treaties between Israel and Arab countries. However, economic conditions remain weak, as oil prices remain below USD45 per barrel, undermining regional growth potential and therefore business activity.

 

Sub-Saharan Africa

Sovereign debt is the biggest threat to regional economic growth, with countries calling for greater support from the international community; Zambia is the first country in the pandemic era to threaten to delay debt repayments. Meanwhile, poverty is set to increase sharply across the region, undermining business activity into the medium term.

 REAL GDP GROWTH (%)                                               

Sources: Haver Analytics; Dun & Bradstreet

 

Dun & Bradstreet Risk Indicator

Dun & Bradstreet’s Country Risk Indicator provides a comparative, cross-border assessment of the risk of doing business in a country. The risk indicator is divided into seven bands, ranging from DB1 to DB7 – DB1 is lowest risk, DB7 is highest risk. Each band is subdivided into quartiles (a-d), with ‘a’ representing slightly less risk than ‘b’ (and so on). Only the DB7 indicator is not divided into quartiles.

The individual DB risk indicators denote the following degrees of risk:

 

Ratings and Outlook Changes:

Ratings changes: Changes in rating are made when we judge that there has been a significant alteration in a country’s overall circumstances – this could stem from a one-off event (e.g. a major natural disaster) or from a change in something structural/cyclical (e.g. an important shift in growth prospects). An upgrade indicates a significant change for the better, a downgrade a significant change for the worse. The number of quartiles of change indicates the extent of the improvement/deterioration in circumstances.

Outlook changes: The outlook trend indicates whether we think a country’s next rating change is likely to be a downgrade (‘Deteriorating’ trend) or an upgrade (‘Improving’ trend). A ‘Stable’ outlook trend indicates that we do not currently anticipate a rating change in the near future.

 

Legal and Copyright Notices

While the editors endeavor to ensure the accuracy of all information and data contained in this Country Insight Report, neither they nor Dun & Bradstreet Limited accepts responsibility for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) whatsoever to the customer or any third party resulting or arising therefrom.

© All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems without permission of the publisher.

 

Disclaimer

Whilst Dun & Bradstreet attempts to ensure that the information provided in our country reports is as accurate and complete as possible, the quantity of detailed information used and the fact that some of the information (which cannot always be verified or validated) is supplied by third parties and sources not controlled by Dun & Bradstreet means that we cannot always guarantee the accuracy, completeness or originality of the information in some reports, and we are therefore not responsible for any errors or omissions in those reports. The recipients of these reports are responsible for determining whether the information contained therein is sufficient for use and shall use their own skill and judgment when choosing to rely upon the reports.

 

022 4941 6666
Contact us